Why "apparel duty" is a range, not a number
Most people come in asking "what's the duty on clothing?" as if it were one tariff. It isn't, and for apparel the spread is wider than almost any other category. The US applies MFN (Most-Favored-Nation) rates from about 12% to 32% on garments, depending on type, fiber, and construction. Our calculator uses 16.5% as a realistic composite for typical knit and woven goods — t-shirts, hoodies, trousers, dresses — but that single number is a planning figure, not a filing number.
Two things make apparel unusually rate-sensitive. First, the US textile lobby has been effective for a century, so clothing carries some of the highest tariffs in the whole schedule — there's no ITA-style zero rate for garments like there is for phones. Second, the rate is locked to physical facts about the product: a cotton knit pullover and a polyester woven jacket can sit 5–10 points apart. The US has no federal VAT, so at least the math stops after duty — simpler than the UK or EU, where VAT compounds on top.
The three HS chapters that actually matter
If you import apparel, your product lives in one of three chapters:
- Chapter 61 — Knitted and crocheted garments. T-shirts, sweaters, hoodies, activewear, socks, underwear. Knits generally run higher than wovens — 14% to 32% — because the domestic knit industry has historically pushed harder for protection. A cotton men's knit tee is 6109.10.
- Chapter 62 — Woven (non-knit) garments. Dress shirts, blouses, suits, jeans, skirts, outerwear. Classification is more granular: a men's cotton woven shirt (6205.20) and a women's cotton blouse (6206.30) are different codes with different rates. Typically 12% to 27%.
- Chapter 63 — Made-up textile articles. Blankets, bed linens, towels, curtains, tablecloths. These aren't worn, so they sit lower — roughly 3% to 12% — but Section 301 can still apply to the subheading.
The first six digits are harmonized globally; digits seven through ten are US-specific and set your exact rate. A 50/50 cotton-polyester blend? CBP uses the essential character test — whichever fiber predominates by weight wins the classification. That single decision can move your rate several points.
Duty by garment type — knit, woven, and fiber
The two axes that decide your rate are construction (knit vs. woven) and fiber content. Get both wrong and you'll under-budget by a third.
Knit vs. woven: same fiber, different bill
A cotton knit t-shirt (6109.10) and a cotton woven button-down (6205.20) are the same material in different form — and knits usually land 2–4 points higher. The domestic knit industry lobbies harder, and it shows in the schedule. CBP officers themselves use the stretch test: knit fabric has interlocking loops and gives; woven has warp and weft and doesn't, unless spandex is blended in.
Fiber content: cotton pays the most, silk the least
The fiber in the outer shell sets the rate bucket, and the political economy is the tell:
- Cotton: The highest rates — 15% to 32%. US cotton growers and textile mills have been effective at securing protection, so cotton garments sit at the top of the Chapter 61/62 range.
- Man-made fibers (polyester, nylon, acrylic): Typically 2–4 points lower than cotton equivalents (12% to 28%). Synthetics don't compete with US agricultural interests, so they face less political wall.
- Wool: A mixed bag — fine wool suiting can hit 25%, coarser wool sometimes qualifies for lower brackets. Wool's smaller share of US imports means less political attention either way.
- Silk: Often the cheapest import in the category — sometimes as low as 2.5% to 6.5%. There's no US silk industry to protect, so it flies under the radar.
Practical move some importers use: a cotton knit pullover might sit under Section 301 while a merino version in the same style doesn't. Fabric choice is a tariff lever, not just an aesthetic one.
Duty by origin — same shirt, different bill
Because Section 301 applies only to Chinese-origin goods, where your apparel is made can change the effective rate by nearly 10 points. This is the biggest lever most apparel importers overlook.
- From China: 16.5% MFN composite plus Section 301 of 7.5% to 25% on codes without an active exclusion. Stacked, that's 24%+ on a typical garment, and above 40% at the 25% Section 301 tier. Estimate it on the China → US Clothing calculator.
- From Vietnam: ~14.5% MFN, no Section 301. That's a ~9.5-point gap versus Chinese apparel — often enough to offset Vietnam's higher per-unit cost. Run it on the Vietnam → US Textiles calculator.
- From Italy / EU: Woven suits and fine knitwear carry the higher end of the MFN range; the EU itself is a major apparel exporter to the US. The Italy → US Textiles page covers the lane. If you're moving goods into the EU or UK instead, VAT is the real cost — see the Import VAT Guide.
- From the UK: Post-Brexit, UK-origin apparel gets preferential rates under the US–UK trade agreement. The China → UK Apparel page flips the direction and shows the UK import side, where VAT — not duty — dominates.
One nuance worth flagging: "origin" means where the garment was substantially transformed, not where it shipped from. A shirt cut in Vietnam from Chinese fabric may or may not qualify as Vietnamese-origin depending on the cut-and-sew rule. Don't take the shipping label as the tariff answer.
Section 301 stacking — and a live deadline
Section 301 is an extra layer on top of MFN, applied to Chinese-origin goods only. A garment at 16.5% MFN + 7.5% Section 301 = 24% effective. At the 25% tier, you're above 40%. Both assess on the same CIF base and add — they don't multiply.
The exclusion list moves constantly — granted, expired, renewed. Critically, the current USTR review covering textile Chapters 61, 62, and 63 accepts public comments through July 15, 2026. If your HTS code has an active exclusion, you skip Section 301 entirely; if it doesn't, you eat the surcharge. A category clear today can be taxed in six months. Pull the latest USTR Federal Register notice before you lock a purchase order, and read our Section 301 China Tariffs guide for the full list-by-list breakdown.
Compliance that isn't duty — but will stop the shipment
Duty is the easy line. These are the rules that actually delay apparel at the border:
- Fiber content & care labeling: The US Textile Fiber Products Identification Act requires accurate fiber percentages and country of origin on the label. A vague "100% cotton" that's actually a blend is a CBP hold waiting to happen.
- Flammability (16 CFR Part 1610): General wearing apparel must pass the standard; children's sleepwear has a far stricter rule (1615/1616). Non-compliant lots get refused.
- Lead & phthalates: CPSC limits on surface coatings and certain plastics. Screen-printed kids' garments get extra scrutiny.
- Country-of-origin marking: A permanent, legible "Made in ___" on the garment or retail packaging. "Imported" isn't enough.
None of these show up in a duty calculator, but all of them can hold a container longer than the tariff line ever would.
The de minimis question — still real, but tightening
For years, a single apparel item under $800 entered the US duty-free under Section 321, cleared electronically in hours. That's still the rule on paper, and it's why DTC brands ship individual orders from Asian fulfillment centers straight to US customers. But the landscape shifted in 2025–2026: the blanket exemption was rolled back, and CBP has tightened Type 86 scrutiny at West Coast ports — average clearance at LAX/LGB stretched from ~4 hours to 8–12 hours at peak. If you've built a model on "just keep it under $800," re-read the 2026 de minimis reform and the global threshold guide before you quote landed cost.
How to actually estimate your landed cost
The honest workflow, in order:
- Pin the 10-digit HTS code. Knit or woven? Cotton, poly, or blend? Men's or women's? This decides both the rate and whether Section 301 applies.
- Add freight and insurance to goods value for CIF. CBP uses CIF, not your FOB factory price, and wants the exchange rate on the export date if you paid in another currency.
- Apply MFN, then add Section 301 only if China-origin and no exclusion.
- Layer in compliance cost — labeling, testing, broker fees — which on a small apparel shipment can rival the duty line.
For a fast number, the Landed Cost Calculator does steps 2–3 automatically once you supply the rate, and the Import Duty Calculator handles a single lane. The US Import Customs Guide walks the full entry if this is your first formal shipment. For category-specific duty, the Furniture and Machinery hubs cover the other big import categories.
Frequently asked questions
What's the real duty rate on imported apparel?
There isn't one. MFN runs 12% to 32% depending on garment type, fiber, and knit-vs-woven construction; 16.5% is a composite for typical goods. Cotton sits at the top, silk near the bottom. If the origin is China and your HTS code lacks a Section 301 exclusion, add 7.5% to 25% on top. The rate is set by your 10-digit code, not by the word "clothing."
Why does a cotton t-shirt owe more than a silk scarf?
Politics, mostly. The US has no domestic silk industry to protect, so silk imports face minimal tariff (often 2.5–6.5%). Cotton apparel competes directly with US textile mills and cotton growers that have secured high MFN protection for a century — so cotton garments land at 15% to 32%. Same "clothing" category, completely different bills.
Should I source apparel from China or Vietnam for the US?
Vietnam's edge is real: ~14.5% MFN with no Section 301, versus China's 16.5% + 7.5–25% = up to 41%. That ~9.5-point gap often offsets Vietnam's higher per-unit cost. But Vietnam's infrastructure still trails China's for complex or high-volume runs, so the break-even is product-specific. Run both calculators — China and Vietnam — with your actual numbers before committing.
Is the $800 de minimis still a thing for apparel?
Not the blanket exemption it was. The 2025–2026 reforms narrowed Section 321, and whether a sub-$800 apparel shipment clears duty-free now depends on origin and current policy rather than a flat $800 line. West Coast clearance has also slowed. Re-check the 2026 reform page before relying on it — this changed recently and the old playbook is stale.
Who's responsible for compliance — me or the factory?
You are. The importer of record is on the hook for fiber labeling, flammability, lead limits, and country-of-origin marking, even if your supplier provided the labels and test reports. Verify them yourself — match fiber percentages to the invoice, confirm the lab is recognized, check the model references. Customs doesn't care that "the supplier said it was certified."